This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis
Other : *Sign up as a member of the project. Tag more articles with our standard project template. Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every Open Era ATP and WTA tournament.
2016 Hopman Cup is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
As far as I can tell, AUS Green has not clinched a spot in the Hopman Cup Final. I changed the infobox back to TBD vs. TBD to reflect this, but I was reverted. Head-to-head results are not the first tiebreaker. In the event that two teams have an identical number of ties won, the first tiebreaker is matches won. Great Britain can still mathematically win more matches than AUS Green, right? —Hermionedidallthework (talk) 18:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]