Talk:2023 Russia–Africa Summit

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Politics and law Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force.

Why this page locked from editing?

First at all I very regret because the Wikipedia does not unlocked user for editing this page. In this context, I have been using verifiable sources, and please don't use any partially actions, just because I am using data from Russia formal sources and my contribution still ongoing to updating this page is not respected with locking this page from editing. Please to unlock this because you just ignoring freedom of thoughts from everyone... B46us h6rm4nto (talk) 09:49, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. New users were including Russian government propaganda in the article, and we do not need this. Ymblanter (talk) 10:06, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

however in this case... My rights to editing has no values in your mind... I am very deep regret caused by this is does not still finished, I am only just updating this into newest version, while you deprive other rights with using statement " including Russian government propaganda"... Shame on you sir... 223.255.228.86 (talk) 11:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are no "rights" on Wikipedia. Certainly there is no "right" to spread propaganda. Ymblanter (talk) 11:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful with what you label as propaganda. Every news source has its own bias and "de Volkskrant" for example, which is a source being discussed under "Most recent edit, which was undone" is just as coloured as the Russian media, albeit in the opposite way: anti-Russian. Schutsheer des Vaderlands (talk) 17:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is bullshit. I know the Volkskrant very well. Ymblanter (talk) 12:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ymblanter, you are correct: this is complete bullshit. I'm going to leave a note for this "protector of the fatherland". Drmies (talk) 01:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most recent edit, which was undone

Edit was undone with the comment "rv Kremlin propaganda". How was it Kremlin propaganda? — Preceding unsigned comment added by El819 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will defer to a third opinion (of an experienced user). Ymblanter (talk) 21:41, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the source cited says it "is seen by analysts as a slap in the face to Putin" (I do not know Dutch) so probably "analysts" can be added back but the edit which said "some analysts" instead is incorrect. Mellk (talk) 12:20, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]