Talk:Bangladesh Liberation War



Semi-protected edit request on 12 December 2019

Bihari casualties in Infobox?

Should we attempt to add Bihari casualties in the Infobox? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 13:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. ਸਰਦਾਰਅਮਨਦੀਪਸਿੰਘ (talk) 11:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The China"

A minor grammatical correction in the fourth paragraph of the introduction. There is no need for "the" before "China". 2001:4DD6:887:0:1988:B960:D1C3:58BA (talk) 15:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 December 2024 --- 17,000 Indian Soldiers Killed during 1971 War

We need to include that Indian Forces lost 17,000 Soldier during the 1971 War with Pakistan. This is very important edit as India lost more soldiers than it reported to the media. https://www.news18.com/world/india-now-supposedly-an-enemy-taslima-nasreen-slams-bangladeshs-shift-towards-pakistan-9147802.html 2607:FEA8:4FE5:6F00:8DD8:BC6F:9901:DC3A (talk) 12:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The AP (talk) 19:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is from reliable Indian News Agency News18.Com, are you saying Indian News Outlets are completely fake as I can point out multiple garbage resources on the following Wiki Article about 1971 War. Please confirm or I will escalate the issue. 2607:FEA8:4FE5:6F00:7984:14A8:D91C:C5C (talk) 20:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
News media is generally reliable for news reporting. In this case, News18.com is a reliable source for the statement that Taslima Nasreen wrote something on Facebook. So what? That doesn't mean that what Nasreen wrote is historically accurate. "Garbage resource" isn't really a term we use here, but for history, books written by historians and published by academic presses make far better sources. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, as Worldbruce pointed out - News18.com is a reliable source for stating the fact that Narseen wrote something on FaceBook - but that doesn't mean what Nasreen wrote is historically accurate. Additionaly I would like to know what you mean by [...] I will escalate the issue? The AP (talk) 21:02, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

East Pakistan Renaissance Society

The East Pakistan Renaissance Society advocated the creation of a sovereign state in eastern British India.

— Preston Grover, Sarasota (Fla) Herald-Tribune, India Partition Will Present Many Problems, 8 June 1947

The cited source for this claim does not mention the East Pakistan Renaissance Society in any capacity. As it stands, the statement lacks verification and may constitute original research. A more relevant source is needed to support this claim. I’ll look for alternative references in the meantime.

Nearly Headless Nick {c} 07:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have replaced the previous citation, which did not mention the East Pakistan Renaissance Society, with a more relevant source:
Talbot, Ian (1998). Pakistan: A Modern History. London: Hurst & Company. p. 90. ISBN 1-85065-385-2.
This should provide a more accurate reference for the statement. If anyone has the time, please review other citations on the page to ensure they properly support the claims being made.
Nearly Headless Nick {c} 07:37, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]