GA Reassessment
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Sourced to three accounts from the victorious side, drafted about 200 years ago. No modern scholarship is cited.
- Hi, thanks for this. Original author here. None of these concerns render the article in violation of the Wikipedia:Good article criteria, so no need to reassess on this basis. BestJackyd101 (talk) 22:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- This article, as it stands, is a giant NPOV violation. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- You are welcome to identify specific statements which are written in a non-neutral tone. Until then I shall remove the tag. Best. Jackyd101 (talk) 23:14, 9 April 2022 (UTC)