| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Christopher Trychay article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Christopher Trychay appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 February 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 11:02, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- ... that a 2002 book relies extensively on a 16th-century priest's churchwardens' accounts that include his support for a failed rebellion?
- Source: [1]
- Reviewed: 1.) Template:Did you know nominations/Hodierna of Jerusalem, 2.) Template:Did you know nominations/Tesseropora rosea, 3.) Template:Did you know nominations/Fatima Payman
Pbritti (talk) 01:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC).
- I do not recall ever seeing, let alone reading, an article about a scholarly history book, so thank you for the opportunity. All three articles are recent, long enough, and fully comprehensive. To call them presentable would be an understatement. But I am not happy with the hook. I think there is more potential in Loades's review, specifically the part where he describes the priest as "an unamiable busybody". I can see a very vivid hook involving a nosey priest, a small Tudor village, and an appraised book. What do you think, Pbritti? Surtsicna (talk) 15:42, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your kind words and good suggestions, Surtsicna! I've written a couple articles on scholarly texts and plan on at least two more this year. Let's see if I can make a good ALT1:
- ... that one review of The Voices of Morebath credited "a somewhat unamiable busybody" and his 54-year-long "running commentary" with recording his parish's participation in a disastrous rebellion?
- Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, Pbritti, that looks much more interesting! A "disastrous rebellion" would be attention-grabbing in any other hook, but can we try something lighter in this instance? Something like a busybody's running commentary of other people's affairs providing a glimpse into everyday life in a Tudor village. I think it would have an even greater impact. Surtsicna (talk) 19:59, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- How about something more like ALT2:
- ... that a 2001 book shares the history of a small Tudor community through a 54-year-long "running commentary" by "a somewhat unamiable busybody"?
- @Surtsicna: Thanks for your interest in this review—I'm glad you want this hook to be as good as it can be! ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:29, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, that is it! I love that one and I hope that you do too. Surtsicna (talk) 00:35, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- How about something more like ALT2:
- Yes, Pbritti, that looks much more interesting! A "disastrous rebellion" would be attention-grabbing in any other hook, but can we try something lighter in this instance? Something like a busybody's running commentary of other people's affairs providing a glimpse into everyday life in a Tudor village. I think it would have an even greater impact. Surtsicna (talk) 19:59, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
