This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism
Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.
Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process).
State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
^Palmer, James (3 January 2012). "6 You die, I live". Heaven Cracks, Earth Shakes: The Tangshan Earthquake and the Death of Mao's China. New York: Basic Books. p. 196. ISBN9780465023493.
Semi-protected edit request on 3 January 2025
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Unfortunately, due to copyright problems involving restoring for the lead photo, which would otherwise be the clear choice, we have to scramble to decide what the lead photo of this article should be. Remsense ‥ 论23:28, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Remsense I am the one who replaced the current image with the colorized one of mao at tiananmen square. the picture used right now is very clearly photoshopped and "beautified" while the photo that I had used is the photo that is already used as the lead in many other languages' articles. I strongly recommend that for the time being, that photo should be used as the lead photothe photo in questionAnonpriest (talk) 05:08, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My notion is likely going to be that photos from the 60s or later are not going to adequately depict Mao as would be expected by a general readership. I did a brief scan through Commons:Mao Zedong for years mostly before 1960, but didn't immediately find any preferable to the present. Remsense ‥ 论01:20, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
1949 is a classic image and would be immediately recognizable. I think, honestly 1965 is my second choice. I don't know. 1955 seems too casual for one of the 20th century's most prominent politicians, war-fighters and political theorists. Simonm223 (talk) 01:52, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
1949 is the best one but the scans for most these images are strange and I think that I might need to do a photo restoration for the image that has the most consensus Wcamp9 (talk) 02:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The background of the 1949 photo is clearly different from the 1959 deleted photo. Before it was explicitly deleted, it should have been considered as one of the options. Furthermore, according to WP:Talk dos and don'ts, please do not change my comments casually, thanks a lot. Nagae Iku (talk) 03:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The original version of the 1949 photo has been found, and its actual date of capture is June 1950. I have included it in the candidate options. Nagae Iku (talk) 08:09, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. 1949 is probably the highest quality, but I think its copyright status needs to be clarified. The description on Commons identifies it as a derivative work, and there's no indication of the copyright status of the original photo. 1965 is a little blurry and not especially recognizable as Mao. That leaves 1955 as my top choice, though it's far from ideal. —Mx. Granger (talk·contribs) 02:43, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=link}
,_Bestanddeelnr_915-6705_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
(1).jpg){kind=link}
(2).jpg){kind=link}
