Talk:Trisha Stafford-Odom/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Riley1012 (talk) 01:38, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 12:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 21:43, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will complete an initial review within the next few days. -Riley1012 (talk) 21:43, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written
No notes on the prose, good job.

Add "and coach" to the end of the first sentence.
- Done. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2. Verifiable
Passes Earwig's. Spot check- 5, 6, 10, 12, 14, 17, 20, 24, 30, 33, 41, and 46 are all fine.

Could you add |via=[[Newspapers.com]] to the references retrieved from Newspapers.com?
- Done. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Are the LinkedIn citations necessary given both times it's used there is an independent source along with it?
- Nice catch. Removed. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3. Broad

I'm assuming there's nothing else to add since being released from NC Central?
- No new developmemts yet. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

4. Neutral
The article is neutral.

5. Stable
The article is stable day-to-day.

6. Illustrated
No images to evaluate, unfortunately.

@WikiOriginal-9: Okay, that's it. This is a well-written article. Let me know when you've gone through the review. -Riley1012 (talk) 01:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Riley1012: Addressed everything. Thanks for the review. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response, everything looks good to go now! -Riley1012 (talk) 01:37, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.