The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 March 2009. The result of the discussion was delete.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science
I'd add that this was the state of the article at that time, and I'd agree that that should have been deleted. It was recreated a while later by someone actually trying to do a good job at it, and eventually the prior history was restored as well. Just Step Sidewaysfrom this world ..... today18:13, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Possible removal of page image
I'm wondering if it's wise to have a page image for this. People with trypophobia may feel very uncomfortable seeing a visual representation of their phobia while researching it. That said, I do not have this phobia, so perhaps this isn't the best idea. DoctorDizzy (talk) 21:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Came here to say this same thing. This is not an article about lotus seed pods.
I see no reason an intentionally inflaming image is required to guarantee article quality on this page but not on other articles about psychological conditions than can also be inflamed by visual stimuli. If this particular image is necessary to improve the quality of this article, why doesn't the article Paranoia require an image saying, "You! Yes, YOU! The person reading this! Wikipedia is watching YOU"? That would be fully comparable, but for some reason Paranoia has no image whatsoever. Perhaps the article Epilepsy requires a flashing GIF too, in order to assure the quality of the article? Why does Entomophobia not need a photo of insects? Why doesn't Ommetaphobia need a visual image of eyes? SteubenGlass (talk) 04:48, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]