User talk:2.50.0.117

February 2024

Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Highlife—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Qzd (talk) 02:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Cassel (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lemonaka was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement since last decline, the latest reason for decline is "Can you find better sources than WP:FINDAGRAVE and WP:YOUTUBE?" However, the latest submission still including Youtube links for citation, that's unreliable source. In fact, google patent is also a weird source, you may want to link the specific patent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erik Cassel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Lemonaka 06:45, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2.50.0.117! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Lemonaka 06:45, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Cassel (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Very large portions of this article are still being sourced by two sources: Business Insider and Sportskeeda, both which contain significant coverage but neither of which are particularly long articles. For biography with detailed personal sections per WP:BLP, it's not ideal that this is basically needing to paraphrase or rely on what one or two sources say for most of the article that doesn't directly relate to Knowledge Revolution or Roblox, which raises the question against WP:INHERITED whether the current sourcing really supports an independent biography. There's got to be more print media or reliable coverage about this person out there?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erik Cassel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]