User talk:ClovisBarnhopper

Welcome!

Hi ClovisBarnhopper! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 06:44, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pasha Pashkov (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowman304 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article does not show notability apart form Dancing with the Stars, to which Pasha Pashkov redirects.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pasha Pashkov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowman304|talk 01:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ClovisBarnhopper! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Snowman304|talk 01:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pasha Pashkov (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pasha Pashkov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:16, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle beyond the Volga (1513) (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle beyond the Volga (1513) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Battle beyond the Volga (1513) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Battle beyond the Volga (1513). Thanks! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Eric Chase Anderson, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Emma Sidi, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 18:56, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry to be a bother, but I have noticed that you removed my edit on English comedian Emma Sidi's article on the basis that it was not sourced.

In my edit, I added the category "English people of Jewish descent" to the list. In the article it states that her surname comes from her Jewish grandfather. This statement is followed by a source. Is there something that I am missing? ClovisBarnhopper (talk) 12:05, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. I need you to STOP adding unverified material (esp. categories) to articles on living people. Drmies (talk) 19:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IShowSpeed

Hi, you tagged Category:IShowSpeed for deletion but forgot to add the category to the discussion list where consensus will determine whether it gets deleted or not. Please read WP:CFD#HOWTO on how to complete the nomination. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Oompa-Loompas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oompa-Loompas. Thanks! Flat Out (talk) 03:59, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oompa-Loompas has been accepted

Oompa-Loompas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]