User talk:MimirIsSmart

Hi! I restored your edit/restoration on the infobox. I already stated why I reverted that anon's previous edit, but I clarify:

• You restored the "Perfecf World" typo
• Perfect World Europe was the parent at the time of Embracer acquisition, but couldn't be from 2008; Perfect World Europe was founded in 2010!
• The description of the company infobox states that: "If the company is majority-owned by a single entity and as such is a subsidiary or division, omit the owner field and use the parent field instead. Do not use the owner field to indicate top-level ownership if it differs from the direct parent."

WolfmanFP (talk) 15:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. While editing I forgot that Take-Two had NOT acquired Arc Games as of the time being, they announced it would complete before the end of the fiscal year. Use Gearbox Publishing (2022-present) for now until they have announced the purchase has gone through. Referring to the sources about the acquisition the company might be transferred to other Embracer divisions. Hence, I do think it is best to keep how it was before to avoid confusion. MimirIsSmart (talk) 22:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lit (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donkey Kong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High-definition.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MimirIsSmart! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. ...

All of your edits are being marked as "minor". This is incorrect. Please refer to WP:MINOR where it says A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions.

Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 17:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited T&E Soft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kōnan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Digimon World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BEC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jewkes

added a link pointing to John Jewkes

Nease

added a link pointing to Floyd Nease

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove sourced content or add unsourced production companies. Many companies are involved in making films, sometimes including animation companies. They are not necessarily production companies. To be labeled a production company, a source is required that explicitly says so. In many articles, a source is already provided in the infobox. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. MimirIsSmart (talk) 02:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jewkes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Jewkes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome MimirIsSmart! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 12:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you going through every page on Special:AncientPages and editing them? Cutlass^Ciera 01:09, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some of those articles are genuinely outdated, with some surname pages including people that had died some time ago (one case dating back to 2022) and long after the surname pages had been last edited. Some could need a bit more polish, but if my edits somehow fail MOS of some projects it is fine to rewrite them or even revert if it's a mistake. MimirIsSmart (talk) 01:14, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marooned (The Ren & Stimpy Show), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Alundra Cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bere (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Bere.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stimpy's Fan Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sadistic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been trouted for: "BONK!" - Scout, TF2 ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 12:50, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

owwwowowowowowowowowughwowowgh MimirIsSmart (talk) 12:51, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Spicy (talk) 12:01, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this kindly act. Wish you and other editors a Merry Christmas! MimirIsSmart (talk) 12:03, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your WP:IPBE right which gave you the ability to bypass IP address blocks will expire on 00:00, 29 December 2024 (UTC). If your IP is still blocked (which you can test by trying to edit when logged-out), please renew by following the instructions at the IPBE page; otherwise, you do not need to do anything. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abishe (talk) 22:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Digital Champ.webp

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 04:59, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening. I see that you have moved Warp to From Yellow To Orange. However, you failed to properly merge the articles, with the latter being a stub with nearly none of the information already present in the former. The Warp (company) article's history has been wiped as well, from what I can see, so that information is now gone. Is there some way to fix this? Thank you. Somewhatviable (talk) 20:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:REPAIR might work. Do check the redirects' page history for those needed for merging. Thanks for notifying. MimirIsSmart (talk) 09:33, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MimirIsSmart. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 08:29, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed this edit that you made where you updated the date on both the {{more citations needed}} and {{use dmy dates}} tags. These are of two kinds of maintenance tags. The first is a cleanup template. Cleanup tags are, it is hoped, temporary, meant to signal a problem. They should be removed once the problem has been resolved. The second is a monitoring tag. Monitoring tags are a signal to users to check the article every so often for continued compliance with whatever standard for that article the tag indicates. They remain on an article permanently.

If you checked the Republic of Formosa article for consistency with the DMY date convention, then it was correct for you to update the date on the DMY tag. That date is meant to indicates when the article was last checked for compliance. It enables editors to notice how long ago the article was last checked, so they can gauge whether it's time for another check. Once an editor has completed a check, it's time to reset the date.

However, the date on a cleanup tag indicates how long it's been since the tag was added to everyone can see when the issue it reports was flagged. That date should never be changed for as long as the tag remains on the page. Cleanup tags add categories to the articles that they're on that classify them by the type of problem and the month the problem was reported. In this case, with the date restored to its previous value, the Republic of Formosa article is now in the maintenance category Category:Articles needing additional references from May 2017. This enables users who perform maintenance tasks to use these categories to focus on articles that have had outstanding problems the longest.

For that reason, I've restored the original date on the citations tag, just for your information. And thanks for checking the dates! Largoplazo (talk) 14:13, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. I apologize for this mistake and know what I did wrong now. MimirIsSmart (talk) 14:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MimirIsSmart. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Bremen Castings, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Coverage in trade magazines is a credible indicaiton of importance. Use WP:AFD if you think this needs deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll reconsider. Leo Riot does need a check in case you receive notifications. MimirIsSmart (talk) 04:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MimirIsSmart

I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Bloodhouse, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 8 § Bloodhouse.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Happy Happy Joy Joy: The Ren and Stimpy Story, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doug Lawrence.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MimirIsSmart, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop violating WP:DATEVAR, and please revert any previous violations you've done by needlessly changing between date formats. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 04:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder, though I wish to have the non-related changes kept. MimirIsSmart (talk) 04:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you reversing my changes? This village belongs to the region. And there should be a separate article about this village. And I wrote about this village, having reliable sources. If it does not require effort, write down the reason for the changes you made.--Rəcəb Yaxşı (talk) 07:45, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was proposed to be deleted years ago before because it was originally created as part of mass creations of places that had existed but have no notability, by a user who retired under fire for this same reason. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullauşağı. After reviewing, I reverted my own edit, as long as you can supplement more reliable information than the stub the user had made. MimirIsSmart (talk) 07:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for reverting the changes! This topic is in my area of ​​interest. I have written about other villages, so if you want, you can check out my work. In each article, I used reliable sources. Rəcəb Yaxşı (talk) 07:53, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop deleting other's comment!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:China_(region)&diff=prev&oldid=1269332866 36.230.3.161 (talk) 05:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dog Tags, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hot-wire.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hi! i wanted to invite you personally (rather than only pinging you) to discuss potentially merging the only yesterday (1991 film) and only yesterday (soundtrack) articles. or at least talk about a balance between the articles. i'm not against the change you made, but my concern is that in the process both articles were left unattended to with issues on both. i'd like to discuss it more on the talk page :)

--Plifal (talk) 01:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would go for eliminating any inconsistencies in the soundtrack article with that of the film article instead. MimirIsSmart (talk) 01:22, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MimirIsSmart that's fine, but then i would politely request that you check content of what is being edited, the sources from which they are citing, and correcting any reference issues before applying your individual preferences. i haven't seen many reliable sources that discuss the soundtrack-as-soundtrack, leaving me questioning what makes it especially notable outside of its connection to the film (as compared to, e.g. spirited away).

--Plifal (talk) 03:47, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I want to move Draft:Lobos (album) to Lobos (album) but I can't because of the redirection. Can you help me? Rangel's Version (talk) 02:12, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MimirIsSmart, and thank you for your help reviewing new articles! I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether a disambiguation page that you marked as reviewed, Hokudai, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagadai. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:54, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not expect an invitation about this but I'll gladly oblige. MimirIsSmart (talk) 06:30, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, MrmirIsSmart. So, I see the "cleanup" tag on the United_States_Invitational_Young_Physicists_Tournament article. Thing is, there's nothing on the talk page, no indication on what the issue with the writing might be. I can't get rid of the tag, because I have a (very much non-financial!) conflict of interest, and I don't want people thinking I'm hiding issues with the article. But I simply don't see the issues! Could you please either remove the tag, fix the issues you see, or post on the talk page so folks can understand what you see? Thanks! Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 17:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I saw in the infoboxes for most of the Squaresoft titles that you removed Square Europe from most of them. That was the actual name of their European division (Square Europe Ltd.), and my source is their official site which closed after the Square Enix merger. [1] Luigitehplumber (talk) 02:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They are as notable an independent publisher as Nintendo of Europe and Sony Computer Entertainment Europe (not counting the developers using that name), so I don't think it needs to be listed separately. Namco Hometek is a close contender to just be credited as Namco but it is an actually separate unit with its own development team. Square Europe just exists to publish and does not have their own branding and identity, so just crediting it as Square would make more sense. MimirIsSmart (talk) 02:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. And plus, a lot of the titles that Namco published in the US (that had no affiliation with the Japanese titles) used "Namco Hometek, Inc." as the copyright holder; so that could explain something.

I can guess that when it comes to Sony-published titles no matter what region, it's best to stick with the standard "Sony Computer Entertainment" name for consistency. Luigitehplumber (talk) 16:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. It's not really about you but your name is mentioned. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 23:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He pinged me at first but thanks for the notice. MimirIsSmart (talk) 23:10, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing the newer versions of the first game. There have been discussions happening that have leaned in favor of exceptions to the "no emulations in infobox" rule for games that receive standalone physical releases. If you disagree, please raise your concerns on the MOSVG talk page so we can discuss further rather than continuing to revert. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 05:48, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies as I had not seen this updated in MOS, but thanks for the reminder! MimirIsSmart (talk) 05:59, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 8 February 2025 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:42, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]