User talk:Rahmatula786

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Christian Fürchtegott Gellert
added a link pointing to Extraordinary
Engkilili (state constituency)
added a link pointing to Assembly
Eros (concept)
added a link pointing to Relationship
Heritable jurisdictions
added a link pointing to Compensation
Pirometer Plant
added a link pointing to Electronic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Nicholas Ross (cricketer)
added links pointing to Score and Debut
World Trade Centre Kuala Lumpur
added links pointing to Convention and Venue
Christian Fürchtegott Gellert
added a link pointing to Extraordinary
Desmond Keegan
added a link pointing to European civilisation
Engkilili (state constituency)
added a link pointing to Assembly
Eros (concept)
added a link pointing to Relationship
From Here on OUT
added a link pointing to President
Heritable jurisdictions
added a link pointing to Compensation
Kuijõe
added a link pointing to Western
Leichosila
added a link pointing to Schmidt
Santi Benedetto e Scholastica
added a link pointing to Church
Sir Gareth Rhys Williams, 3rd Baronet
added a link pointing to Codner
Tamás Harle
added a link pointing to Commission

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Nicholas Ross (cricketer)
added links pointing to Score and Debut
Desmond Keegan
added a link pointing to European civilisation
Leichosila
added a link pointing to Schmidt

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

you can't redirect Ministry of Health (Koshi Province) and Ministry of Economic Affairs and Planning (Koshi Province) 2400:1A00:BD20:3BB8:D595:1712:A588:12C6 (talk) 07:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI this is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anup Rajbanshi. C F A 18:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rahmatula786 -- I've declined this speedy because the article is not unsalvageably promotional, although the tone does need attention. Please re-read the G11 rubric before nominating under this criterion again. If you consider that notability is a problem then I'd suggest Articles for Deletion, so that all the available sources can be examined fully. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Rahmatula786 (talk) 08:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Deletion Discussion for Article Ram Krishna Bantawa

Hi Rahmatula786,
I hope this message finds you well.
Thank you for raising concerns about the article on Ram Krishna Bantawa. I firmly believe the article meets the requirements outlined in Wikipedia’s WP:NAUTHOR and WP:SIGCOV guidelines. Below is an explanation supporting this assertion:
Notability as an Author (WP:NAUTHOR):
  • Ram Krishna Bantawa is a recognized author and lyricist in Nepali literature. He is known for his novel Saghan Tuwanlo (Shrill Mist) and novel Amalai Chithi (Letter to Mother-whose English translation is forthcoming.) His work has made a significant cultural impact, particularly within the Nepali community.
  • His lyrics and songs are available on platforms such as YouTube.
  • Saghan Tuwanlo is included in the curriculum of Tribhuvan University, highlighting its academic and cultural significance.His novels address meaningful societal issues such as women’s rights, untouchability, and Sati Pratha (the practice of widow immolation), further emphasizing his contributions to literature and social discourse.
Significant Coverage (WP:SIGCOV):
  • Independent and reliable media outlets, including Kantipur, Annapurna Post, and various Hong Kong-based Nepali newspapers, have provided coverage of Bantawa’s work. This demonstrates his influence in Nepali literature and music.
  • He has been featured in interviews and podcasts that delve into his life, literary contributions, and societal impact, providing further evidence of significant independent coverage.
  • Bantawa has received several awards and certificates from reputable organizations, including:Nepalese Literary Academy Hong Kong , Heavenly Path Hong Kong , Charu Sahitya Pratisthan , Hong Kong Nepalese Federation , Lyricist Association of Nepal
The article references independent and verifiable sources that discuss Ram Krishna Bantawa’s work in detail. Taken collectively, these factors satisfy the standards for inclusion in Wikipedia under WP:NAUTHOR and WP:SIGCOV.
If additional information or sources are required to further support this assertion and enhance the article, I would be happy to assist.
Best regards,
Rasil Shrestha

Rasilshrestha (talk) 09:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2001 Copa de la Reina de Fútbol
added a link pointing to Edition
Jocks Pond Outlet
added a link pointing to Flow
SS City of Brunswick
added a link pointing to Freighter
Wakkund
added a link pointing to Southern
Zou Qiang
added a link pointing to Portion

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New message from RationalPuff

[[1]]

Thank you for your effort to contribute to the article. However, please avoid removing content from the article without first consulting the talk page. There are plenty of discussions on the talk page that might be helpful. Thank you. RationalPuff (talk) 13:23, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, I'm RationalPuff. I noticed that you recently removed content from Biswaroop Roy Chowdhury without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please refrain from editing the article without first discussing your proposed changes on the Wikipedia talk page. Remember, Wikipedia is not a platform for personal viewpoints or how we might prefer things to be presented. Instead, it is a collaborative effort to lay out factual information supported by reliable references. RationalPuff (talk) 20:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering why you are so much particular about this article. I am from Nepal, don’t know him personally, so no question of personal viewpoints. You are from india , u might have personal viewpoints. It’s interesting to see your response for this article. What i have done edit is not blanking, i have mentioned reasons. Rest what u talked , i agree . Rahmatula786 (talk) 05:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’m pretty much on the same page as yours. The guy is a fraudster and a threat to public health. Much I wish would write about him and his fraudulent activities, but we must remember Wikipedia is not a place for personal opinions or perspectives. We can’t exclude or include information just because we agree/disagree. If there are reliable and verifiable sources supporting the content, it must be presented objectively without bias or deliberate omission. Hope makes sense.
Please feel free to suggest in the talk page what changes you are proposing, keeping in mind the points above.
Thanks. RationalPuff (talk) 16:41, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed Rahmatula786 (talk) 16:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2001 Copa de la Reina de Fútbol
added a link pointing to Edition
Wakkund
added a link pointing to Southern

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armand Hatchuel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enterprise.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi minister and ministry are separate title you understand for example Ministry of Defence (Australia) and Minister of Defence (Australia) more 2001:DF7:BE80:1A5D:CDAE:4F73:8E3A:5E3E (talk) 14:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Does it really worth in Nepalese context. Try to Make some useful articles and don’t focus on ministers, it looks like promotion of politicians. You should be aware of condition of country and help here to bring some good stuff . Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You edited unwanted articles without any information just say There is no need of such article . The information can be kept in the individual ministries. It incorrect due title Separate 2001:DF7:BE80:1A5D:CDAE:4F73:8E3A:5E3E (talk) 15:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do you even you know what minister and ministry with any point you can decline. First known about it. 2001:DF7:BE80:1A5D:CDAE:4F73:8E3A:5E3E (talk) 15:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I know u have worked hard to write this draft. But sadly, it’s not in proper direction. Plz create an account and contribute to Wikipedia if ur really interested to bring genuine stuff and contribute to encyclopaedia. Otherwise don’t waste your time neither mine. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You can also stop redirect ministry and minister or we maybe blocked 2001:DF7:BE80:1A5D:CDAE:4F73:8E3A:5E3E (talk) 15:28, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I didn’t understand what you are trying to convey. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:32, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I worried in future your username might blocked due unnecessary writing and redirect some articles from example like Ministry of Health (Koshi Province) because it against policy because everyone Nepal's province has separate ministry to understand Nepal politics. 2001:DF7:BE80:1A5D:CDAE:4F73:8E3A:5E3E (talk) 15:36, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for suggestions and concerns. I am active in Wikipedia to stop paid and promotional contents in Nepal and remove all non sense stuff from Wikipedia in Nepal. If you have any thing genuine. Plz make a draft and see my response. I am not worried for my future till i am doing my job in good faith and being unbiased. Thank you and good night. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:42, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Need your guidance

Need your guidance on how to improve the article LunarFrosty (talk) 04:16, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Plz let me know how I can help you Rahmatula786 (talk) 05:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
for organization like university to meet notability, news article which are published on the news portal can be used for reliable source? LunarFrosty (talk) 05:46, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
you should have at least 2 sources having in depth coverage about organisation and should be neutral . Rahmatula786 (talk) 07:56, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ok thanks for reply LunarFrosty (talk) 08:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Easterhouse Festival Society Review

Hi there, thanks for your review of Easterhouse Festival Society.

re your suggestion for how to improve, you mentioned a need for only relevant information, and neutral sources. I was just hoping for some clarification on which information you thought was irrelevant, and which sources you thought weren’t neutral. The last two reviewers both homed in on the section that I completely removed from this last submission as being the area which was problematic, so I took that all out, so it would be really helpful if you could let me know what else you think needs removed?

Re the sources, the current version has Scottish Tv, an academic thesis, an academic conference report, a published biography (not autobiography) of one of the Society members, the BBC, a local history site, The herald newspaper, the Glasgow times newspaper, and a Swedish culture think tank.

The Swedish culture think tank is a speech / an interview, so they wouldn’t count for notability purposes, but I would have thought that the other sources would have done that already? I could cut those two sources out completely too, but it would mean cutting out the entire “when and why did the Society finish its work” section, which, though short, brings the article to a neat close.

Thanks for your time. Absurdum4242 (talk) 06:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep key things only. You need to make the article almost 30-40% of it’s size at present. Make introduction short and relevant. Don’t keep unsourced lines or paragraphs. Best wishes. Rahmatula786 (talk) 07:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rahmatula786. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Florida International Boarding Higher Secondary School, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Educational insitutions are not in scope for A7. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:24, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Graded English Medium School

Hello Rahmatula786. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Graded English Medium School, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is some issues with tone but not tot he point where deletion is warranted. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Gyanjyoti Higher Secondary School

Hello Rahmatula786, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Gyanjyoti Higher Secondary School, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your speedy deletion nominations

Please read and understand the criteria for speedy deletion. I've just declined three of your requests. Can you please explain how Gyanjyoti Higher Secondary School is unambiguous advertising. I note that user:Espresso Addict has previously advised you to read through what constitutes WP:G11. -- Whpq (talk) 14:39, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article states that the school was established in someone's home, which suggests that it was written by someone associated with the school, likely for promotional purposes. I understand that this situation involves a conflict of interest (COI), but I am unsure whether it meets the criteria for G11. Could you clarify this for me? I often struggle to differentiate between COI and advertising. If an article is written or commissioned specifically for promotional purposes, how should it be handled? Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:11, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Being founded in somebody's home is a statement of fact and is not an indication of conflict of interest. Apple Inc. was founded in the home of Steve Job's parents. G11 is unambiguous advertising that would need to be fundamentally rewritten ion order to be an encyclopedia article. All I see at Gyanjyoti Higher Secondary School are statements of fact. Even if there is a conflict of interest, that does not automatically mean the text is promotional. If I founded the company PishPoshCo and wrote "PishPoshCo is a retailer established in 2011 selling small appliances and electronics goods. The company was founded with one store in Springfield, and expanded to a chain of 212 stores by the end of 2024.", that would not be advertising. On the other hand "PishPoshco is the leading retailer of small appliances electronics goods. You can go to any store to find the best deals!" would be. -- Whpq (talk) 16:54, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My advice would be to completely ignore COI for tagging G11. The editors' motivations in writing are not relevant for G11; what is important is whether the text they have written is so promotional that, if one removes every overtly promotional statement, there would be nothing left. That is clearly not the case for Gyanjyoti Higher Secondary School. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 17:01, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]