User talk:Sophisticatedevening

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hyperoxia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:55, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to help us improve coverage of women. When you feel ready to create your first biography, you'll find basic guidance in our Ten Simple Rules. If you would like others to see your interest in the project, you can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--Ipigott (talk) 08:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi!

I saw that you added a suspected AI tag on the 324th Infantry Regiment (United States) page. I took a look and didn't see any red flags and ran it through gptzero and got a 3% hit. Was wondering if you're ok with removing?

Best, Marleeashton (talk) 22:37, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

Apologies if the article was human written, I used zerogpt and got 83%, and the organization in the history section seemed similar to actual AI articles, if you disagree or can confirm it's not absolutely feel free to remove, thanks for asking! Sophisticatedevening (talk) 17:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good!!!! Happy new years! Marleeashton (talk) 00:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sophisticatedevening. I accidentally deleted my reasoning and published it without, I published it again with the reasoning.

At the 16.11.2024 I also added the ships to the order backlog at the time and wanted to add or change small changes there after the official ship data was announced

Here is my new reason:

,,Changes to the order backlog table as Disney Cruise Line has published the announcement from August 2024 the official ship data includes a fifth Wish Class Ship and 3 smaller ships with a size of approximately 100,000 GT.''

I hope you understand me

HIHIMOINMOIN1

HIHIMOINMOIN1 (talk) 19:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying. Cheers! Sophisticatedevening (talk) 19:32, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see that at Plum Sykes you twice restored material which had been removed with edit summaries indicating that it was being removed because it was unsourced. Wikipedia policy is that article content which has been removed because it is unsourced must not be restored without providing a reference to a reliable source. I also see that you posted a message to the editor who reverted your mistaken editing, referring to that editor's edits as "test" edits. I have looked at the edits in question, and I can't see any reason at all to think they were intended as tests; they look to me as though they were intended as permanent improvements to the article. There are some editors who seem to treat the templated warnings on test edits as catchall warnings for anything that they think is wrong but is not covered by any other templated message. I don't know whether that's what you were doing, but if it was then please don't. If none of tbe ready made messages is appropriate in a particular case, then don't use one which isn't appropriate; instead take the small amount of trouble needed to write a message which is appropriate. JBW (talk) 20:01, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my mistake, thank you for taking the time to let me know. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 20:18, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doctoral Advisor Herbert Dreeskamp, Habilitation Sigrid Peyerimhoff 131.220.249.239 (talk) 15:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the comment, I'll definitely work on those things, thanks!

Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 21:54, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep, I have completed your suggestions and have added a lot more references. Please let me know if it still needs work, thanks!

Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 00:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sophisticatedevening: Can you resubmit it for review and post it to mainspace. scope_creep^Talk 08:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creepYou're okay with me moving to mainspace? Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 14:55, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. There is two for it. The first is that its contingent on you as an excellent editor to fix the references and find more if you can. You have a duty of care to do it. And second, its still borderline notable and I would like to see better references, otherwise I would have mainspaced it yesterday. It needs to be able able to prove its notable and it doesn't at the moment. I hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 15:04, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you left a !vote at the Jean-Marc Rives AfD discussion, but it appears to be unsigned. Would you mind signing it so it's clear who made the comment?

Regards, ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 01:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course, thanks for reminding me, it appears I need to take a desperately needed nap. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 15:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem! You probably just forgot, but it's all sorted now. Hope you get a refreshing nap. ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 15:41, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:39, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

shush BaggierMarlin08 (talk) 12:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]