User talk:Voorts

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|Voorts}}), so that I will be notified.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Monthly archives (post-October 2024)

Old archives (pre-October 2024)

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by .

Women in Red February 2025

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331

Online events:

New: Black women | Alphabet run C & D
Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music

Announcements from other communities:

Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history

Tip of the month:

Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed ones on Creative Commons search

Suggestion:

Consider helping to promote women under In the news and On this day on Wikipedia's main page

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

User casting more aspersions?

Please don't bicker on my talk page. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:09, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hello. You warned a user not to cast any more aspersions. Is this casting an aspersion: diff link? George Ho (talk) 14:28, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously doubt calling your argument oppinated counts as making random accusations it doesnt even matter because i never cast asperations to begin with Wwew345t (talk) 14:59, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You accused me of not having watched the show. FWIW, I separate fandom from integrity of this project. Also, telling readers to watch the show before making an action in Wikipedia makes me wonder why you appear in this project in the first place. George Ho (talk) 15:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Im telling you to watch the show before you imply someone didnt have a significant role in it Wwew345t (talk) 15:06, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Other than winning a season. George Ho (talk) 15:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You left out the part where jermey drove the strategy on his tribe in san juan del sur which lead to his blindside in 10th place because he was a threat his blindside also motivated the eventual winners gameplay for the rest of the season not to mention he made it far in his winners at war apperance Wwew345t (talk) 15:15, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Casting aspersions

See above. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:09, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I have a basis when i say i suspect george ho of having a aganeda look at every surviv9r winner whos pages have been re directed or deleted check out who started the afd for it then come and tell me my claim is ridiculous Wwew345t (talk) 15:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can even establish a motive he started nominating those pages after a article he attempted to create (kelly willesworth) got rejected Wwew345t (talk) 15:22, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hello

Great to meet at Wikipedia Day! Just wanted to say hello. Hexatekin (talk) 20:23, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi back. Nice meeting you too. Hopefully I'll be able to make it to more NYC events this year. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:10, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy closure of ANI request

Complying with WP:AAR, can you explain why you decided to speedy close my ANI request without any proper explanation. I wasn't trying to win arguments. Administrators can strikethrough comments like that, it's happened to me before. Especially when those comments are made in an ignorant and sometimes political , I was about to post more diffs and evidence of this, but you closed it before I was able to do so. Rc2barrington (talk) 02:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Admins don't strike arguments in RfC discussions just because one editor says they disagree with them or thinks they're wrong. voorts (talk/contributions) 12:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also just noticed you mentioned AAR. I don't care if you do that, but I feel I should advise you that if you do, it probably won't go how you think it's going to go. voorts (talk/contributions) 16:46, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Music Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:The Hillbilly Thomists on a "Music" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mike McLachlan on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]