Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 in New York City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is against the existence of these articles. Star Mississippi 22:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2018 in New York City

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We do not normally consider it notable to cover the events of a specific city in a year and this article is terribly incomplete as well. Delete for failure of LISTN TartarTorte 14:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also

2020 in New York City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2021 in New York City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. TartarTorte 14:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. TartarTorte 14:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Added two more in the set, TartarTorte. Yes New York City is larger than many countries, but I really don't think we should have such individual city/year articles that will be left wildly incomplete. Major events belong at Timeline of New York City, and there are respective categories for this as well. Reywas92^Talk 15:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the additions! TartarTorte 15:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Category:2018_in_New_York_City each year has a category already. Not sure how you could make that into a proper list article though. Dream Focus 15:35, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all No need per Reywas. Azuredivay (talk) 18:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom User:Reywas92's comments. Frank Anchor 18:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The argument that he articles are incomple imply there is the posiblity of adding signicant content to them. If we are not doingthis for about 10 cities of similar importance, we should. DGG ( talk ) 06:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, unnecessary level of detail. Geschichte (talk) 06:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nominator. 777burger ^{user talk} ^contribs 17:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.