- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn. per nominator's comment. (non-admin closure) Exemplo347 (talk) 19:08, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- A Smoked Husband (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Besides the one reference in the article, trying to find anything on this brings up a bunch of stuff related to smoking. Amongst the mess is this though it looks like a sales site to me. Mind you it does have a BFI entry , though I'm not 100% sure if it's an WP:RS . MM ('"HURRRR?) (Hmmmmm.) 18:41, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I found several references via Google Books in a few moments. Not bad for a film that's 109 years old. Your rational for deletion is based around your own inability to use Google/find sources, which is a pretty weak argument. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 18:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Withdrawn: Checked up to Page 3 on Google, but whatever, per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_Smoked_Husband&type=revision&diff=771295975&oldid=771294152 that should hit policy requirements. MM ('"HURRRR?) (Hmmmmm.) 19:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.