Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Al-Bladi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Subject shown in reliable sources to satisfy a subject-specific guideline, overwhelming consensus from historic AfDs shows this is sufficient, no need to keep this open for purely administrative reasons. Fenix down (talk) 09:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah Al-Bladi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer that fails WP:GNG RotubirtnoC (talk) 21:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 21:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 21:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I am assuming that Abdullah Al-Bladi and Abdullah Al-Bilady are one and the same; he has played for Al Fateh, a team in the Saudi Professional League, a fully professional league per WP:FPL. Granted, he's only played 19 minutes, but he's played, and so he meets WP:NFOOTY. /wiae /tlk 21:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Having played in in a fully pro league, he passes WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC):Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:NFOOTBALL.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:NFOOTBALL; needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 18:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.