Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Dhania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 10:43, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Dhania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. IPS officer recently promoted to DCP, just doing his duty. Sources only cover transfers and appointment. Nothing showing notability or significant contributions. Junbeesh (talk) 09:46, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, India, and Bihar. Junbeesh (talk) 09:46, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and Delhi. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Agree with the nominator. Taabii (talk) 07:54, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:GNG as he got coverage only about his promotion and transfers which is common in such professions and not so unique. Also DCP is not the highest rank for police officers in India. TheSlumPanda (talk) 09:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Becoming an IPS officer is not about gaining recognition; it’s simply a job. Moreover, this individual fails in both WP:SNG and WP:NBIO. Charlie (talk) 03:42, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As per the nomination. A regular officer, doing his work, nothing significant for the WP:NOTABILITY Zuck28 (talk) 10:38, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per nom and agree with other delete votes above. RangersRus (talk) 17:50, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I support the nominator’s rationale and the delete votes above.𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 04:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.