Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Connor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Connor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a young racing driver who has only competed in very minor series. Beyond the two Formula Scout articles cited in the article ("Alex Connor making F3 debut at Dubai Autodrome this weekend" and "Alex Connor moves into BRDC British F3 with Arden", both of which are fairly WP:ROUTINE announcements), the only coverage I could find in an independent reliable source which constituted more than a passing mention was this Autosport article. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 07:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 07:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 07:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 07:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 07:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Looks like a fairly promising driver but ultimately a case of WP:TOOSOON. Sources may come but they don't exist at the moment, and the subject fails both the WP:GNG and WP:NMOTORSPORT (both the old and proposed versions). 5225_C (talk • contributions) 10:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete agree with nom. Oaktree b (talk) 16:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. No evidence of notability. A7V2 (talk) 08:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.