- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. as a copyright violation. As stated below, the subject could be notable enough for an article, but the article will have to be rewritten. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:13, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Asad aslam khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. I failed to verify per WP:V in reliable sources per WP:RS. Greenbörg (talk) 10:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:13, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
DeleteRS only nameching the subject in news stories. nothing in the RS which can demonstrate the notability of the subject. --Saqib (talk) 04:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Saqib: He looks-like a reciptent of Sitara-i-Imtiaz per his article. Can you provide a source for it? Greenbörg (talk) 12:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- True indeed [1]. hence strike down my delete vote and suggest we should Week keep this. And I also found this bio is copyvio of [2] so it should be first speedy deleted and then re-created from scratch. --Saqib (talk) 12:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Saqib: He looks-like a reciptent of Sitara-i-Imtiaz per his article. Can you provide a source for it? Greenbörg (talk) 12:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.