- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Banmata Ji (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is mostly gibberish. Robert McLenon PRODed it as "By its own statement, provides very little information. Very poorly constructed. Does not add to the encyclopedia in its current state" but that was removed without explanation. The sources seem to be poor and tangential to the alleged deity. Sitush (talk) 15:04, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Mis-spelled the name of @Robert McClenon: - my apologies. - Sitush (talk) 15:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Anyone can remove a PROD for any reason including a useless reason. I concur that it is mostly gibberish. Maybe its author should contribute to the Wikipedia in another language. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.