Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:28, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CORP. gets passing mentions in the press but nothing where the firm is the subject LibStar (talk) 07:08, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Bartlit Beck is a very well-known elite litigation boutique firm, considered one of the top boutique firms in the United States. I've updated the article to include [1] from American Lawyer. A few more articles and mentions from a quick search: [2], [3], [4]. Agtx (talk) 17:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Atgx. James500 (talk) 20:24, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.