Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battenberg Hill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dospey Heights. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:36, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battenberg Hill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND #4 due to the lack of information beyond statistics and coordinates. I would support a redirect to Dospey Heights. BilledMammal (talk) 06:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Antarctica. BilledMammal (talk) 06:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect Zero substantive coverage warranting a stand-alone article, especially for a fairly small hill. Reywas92^Talk 20:19, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete/Redirect This is interesting, but excepting for basic topographical data, there is no in-depth coverage. Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 10:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.