Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biodynamic enzymology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Biodynamic enzymology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essay-type, uncritical eulogy of what appears to be a fringe concept championed by a tiny group, sourced almost entirely to predatory journals (AFAICS these are all Science Publishing Group). Apart from the bad sourcing, I don't quite know what to make of this; I feel I'm being out-waffled. The (euphemistically) "lede" and the first two sections could be removed with no loss at all, as could the first half of section three. Then we are finally getting into material not covered elsewhere, and - is it? Is this just the claims of one guy (Ferorelli)? Even if the concept were notable, this article comes with so many warning signs I'd like to see it taken round the shed directly. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:52, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:52, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete That's a real stinker. "Biodynamic" in this context basically means "magic". There don't seem to be any objective treatments of the subject, only FRINGE garbáge. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 18:24, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FRINGE nonsense Dexxtrall (talk) 22:23, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete For the love of Zeus, what is this? Kill it with fire. Note that the same bizarre content is duplicated in Enzymology, perhaps you should bundle it together in this AfD. Tercer (talk) 09:36, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Enzymology has been redirected to enzyme, so it shouldn't be a problem unless the bad content is restored. XOR'easter (talk) 21:13, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Yes, enzymes are dynamic systems, and they play a role in biological dynamics. But there is no such thing as Biodynamic enzymology. My very best wishes (talk) 17:53, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all the above. XOR'easter (talk) 21:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Cinadon36 08:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.