Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Border 2 (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 19:07, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Border 2 (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Planned film that does not satisfy film notability guidelines or general notability, and in particular does not satisfy future film notability guidelines. Unreleased films are only notable if production, that is, principal photography, has begun, and production itself is notable. This film has only been announced. The four references are all nearly the same, simply announcements that the director plans to make the film.

Reference Number	Reference	Comments	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	India Today	Announcement of plan of film	Yes	No. Future existence is not significant coverage.	Yes	No
2	NDTV.com	Announcement of plan for film	Yes	No. Future existence is not significant coverage.	Yes	No
3	Indian Express	Announcement of plan for film	Yes	No. Future existence is not significant coverage.	Yes	No
4	Times of India	Announcement of film, with discussion	Yes	No, even if somewhat more detailed.	No	No

This stub does not speak for itself, and there is nothing here that approaches significant coverage of a film or its production.

Draftify as nominator. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: Checked for in-depth coverage, but I can't find any. These sources are just announcements, release date but not significant coverage. Additionally, the shooting of the film has not yet started. The film obviously fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. The first part of the film was very famous in India, so it will surely get more coverage in the future and will meet notability, but it is currently not ready for mainspace. GrabUp - Talk 19:16, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Border (1997 film)#Sequels -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify. WP:TOOSOON. Just announcements and the film has not begin production. It needs to pass post production stage for a warranted page. RangersRus (talk) 16:18, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: Currently, the article does not meet WP:NFILM and WP:GNG guidelines due to the lack of coverage and the fact that filming has yet to begin. However, by moving it to draft space, its editors can add to it and build its content. The content may meet Wikipedia's standards as the film is made and more details become known.--AstridMitch (talk) 04:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: Per other editors' arguments, article is WP:NOTJUSTYET, as it hasn't yet entered the production stage. Mjks28 (talk) 13:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.