Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burke Slusher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:42, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Burke Slusher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:COI issues since its inception in 2007 and has even been edited by Slusher himself at one point. This explains why this article is currently a CV rather than an encyclopaedia article. Content issues aside, this also has WP:NFOOTBALL concerns as the subject only seems to have, at best, been an assistant coach in a semi-pro league. The only somewhat decent coverage is on his USL Soccer profile page. Everything else is either insignificant or non-independent. ProQuest and Google News come back with nothing. Google itself is filled mostly with Wikipedia mirrors. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 17:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:GNG as there appears to be no SIGCOV for the subject. GauchoDude (talk) 19:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete definite failure of WP:GNG. --Paul McDonald (talk) 19:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, does not meet any Wikipedia guideline. Geschichte (talk) 09:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – I cleaned up the infobox to make it even more abundantly clear that he fails NFOOTY. Also fails GNG as per nom. Keskkonnakaitse (talk) 20:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.