Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chordless

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:40, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chordless

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to verify notability in reliable sources. -- samj _in ^out 10:35, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Note that this is about a distributed replicated scalable hash table based on the chord project. My guess is that it involves computers. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yes, after I created the article I realized that the project probably is not notable enough. I don't actually agree with the notability critieron (I find all the non-notable subjects on Wikipedia to be a great resource), but I realize that I have to play by the rules. However, perhaps it could be merged with/appended to the Chord page? //zond

Comment notability is another topic for another day, and while a hybrid solution (like hiding non-notable articles from search and preventing linking to them from others) would be cool, don't hold your breath. We have limited resources and it's important they are focused on making what we have trustworthy. Iff Chord is noteworthy then a merge sounds sensible. -- samj _in ^out 18:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.