| This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 March 18. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete without prejudice. Unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Chris DeRosa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I was unable to find significant coverage (or any coverage) of this musician in reliable sources; he does not appear to meet the relevant guideline. Chick Bowen 04:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- What do you consider reliable sources? In the field of drummers Modern Drummer and Drum! magazines seem as good a referance as they get. He has been published and written about in both. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.14.146.247 (talk • contribs)
- This appears to be the Drum! reference you're talking about. I couldn't find the Modern Drummer one. That seems to be fairly trivial to me. WP:Music says that a criterion is "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable and are independent." I don't think DeRosa is there yet. He's obviously a promising young musician, but I don't think he meets our inclusion standards at this time. Chick Bowen 01:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.