Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clarendon Football Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keep per prior related discussions.

Thank you everyone for participating and assuming good faith! If you disagree with this closure, please take your concerns to Deletion Review prior to my talk page. Thanks again and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 01:28, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clarendon Football Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Football club in the village of Clarendon, South Australia (Population ~ 600) in the Adelaide Hills. Plays in a local league against other villages in the Adelaide Hills. No notable achievements. Sources are to self-published books by Peter Lines Given that around 12% of people in Australia are males aged 12-35, they have around 80 prime-aged people to choose from, so less people available than an average high school ~ 1000 students. So not notable since we don't have articles for high school sports teams. Bumbubookworm (talk) 00:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:09, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There is sustained long term coverage of the subject. I have not checked these but there are potentially over 6,000 references available here. The significant majority of these will be routine and-or minor and some not relevant, but even if only 1% are good references, there will be more than sufficient to support GNG. Looks like insufficient BEFORE was done. Aoziwe (talk) 10:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:37, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• At least redirect to Clarendon, South Australia or a parent league as an alternative to deletion. Open to a full keep if better sources are found. I have concerns about the nominator's approach to determining notability, see my comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macclesfield Football Club. – Teratix ₵ 12:05, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and improve, as per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macclesfield Football Club Screech1616 (talk) 13:42, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 19:48, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.