- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- Closure: A Story of Everything (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Based on the information in the article it is not a substantially important book. The information is already in the article on the author DGG ( talk ) 04:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Legacypac (talk) 04:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment. Why not just redirect it? --Michig (talk) 09:03, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I see no authoritative references that suggest notability.--Rpclod (talk) 17:40, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: I found a review from the magazine Philosophy Now, but that isn't enough to make this pass WP:BK. SL93 (talk) 21:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.