Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colette Urban

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 07:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Colette Urban (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · [1])

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. KKKNL1488 (talk) 02:34, 24 August 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep subject does in fact meet WP:GNG, appears to be an well known and influential artist. Google and news results are extensive. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 07:22, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Obituaries in The Globe and Mail and CBC. Clearly notable. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:56, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep As well as having enough sources to meet WP:GNG, she meets both WP:ARTIST#3 and WP:NACADEMIC#3. I have added one source to the article - more could certainly be added, and the article could use some cleaning up, but that is not a reason to delete. RebeccaGreen (talk) 09:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There are several monographs about her work, including, a catalogue raisonné. Vexations (talk) 13:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, SNOWFIGHT!!!, for reasons above:)) Coolabahapple (talk) 02:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.