Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornelia Kramer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cornelia Kramer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar case to Cecilie Fløe, Emma Færge, Sofie Karsberg and other recently deleted Danish articles on footballers. No claim to passing WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTBALL, in a Danish source search, I could not find any WP:SIGCOV of Kramer. Only independent sources that I could find were Ekstra Bladet and UEFA, none of which address Kramer in detail. Source analysis to follow, which will explain why the cited sources don't show SIGCOV. Also checked the Danish and Italian Wikipedia articles and none of the sources cited there are any good either. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment - the sourcing isn't enough Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table
Source	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.fodboldforpiger.dk/2016/11/13-aarige-cornelia-debuterede-i-soendags-paa-aabs-u18-dm-hold/	Routine coverage of a teenager making their youth team debut. See also WP:YOUNGATH	✘ No
https://www.dbu.dk/resultater/pulje/306174	Not mentioned	✘ No
https://www.fodboldforpiger.dk/2019/04/20-spillere-udtaget-til-u17-em-i-bulgarien/	Squad list mention	✘ No
https://www.dbu.dk/landshold/landsholdsdatabasen/MatchInfo/9095	Mentioned once	✘ No
https://int.soccerway.com/players/cornelia-kramer/575990/	Stats	✘ No
https://www.dbu.dk/landshold/landsholdsdatabasen/PlayerInfo/7828	Stats	✘ No
https://www.soccerdonna.de/wiki/pedia/profil/spieler_37288.html	Stats	✘ No
https://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/clubs/players/250126592/	Page doesn't work for me but it's clearly a stats page	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 19:24, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom, no claim to passing WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTBALL. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom fails WP:GNG. Henriklars (talk) 06:44, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above. No Great Shaker (talk) 03:55, 13 September 2021
Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC)(UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.