Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curbi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Curbi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. Unable to locate reliable secondary sources to support notability. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - can use expansion, has a lot of reliable sources per Google search (passes WP:BASIC), has a song charted on the Belgian chart (passes WP:MUSICBIO). WP:ANYBIO is additional, not a required guideline. - TheMagnificentist 16:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Had one song on a "bubbling under" chart here. Hardly a mark of notability. And sadly, didn't pass the Bing test, just the Google test. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:48, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete does not meet the inclusion criteria for a musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Plus a WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable subject. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as per nomination. The Beatport listings is largely WP:PRIMARY. One local source on him signing a contract with Spinnin' here at the age of 16 in January 2015. Clearly WP:TOOSOON. No album, one EP. Karst (talk) 11:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.