Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Moore (Colorado)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Moore (Colorado) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ANYBIO Assirian cat (talk) 11:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Colorado. Shellwood (talk) 13:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Old guy running for office that used to be in the Navy. Nothing notable, yet. Can be recreated if/when he wins. Oaktree b (talk) 15:04, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Don't Delete -Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline WP:POLITICIAN WP:NPOL WP:GNG WP:SIGCOV He has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject Artedm (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline WP:POLITICIAN WP:NPOL WP:GNG WP:SIGCOV Artedm (talk) 15:04, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Just no. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:27, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the coverage is all incidental to the election. If Moore is elected as Lieutenant governor, he will be notable, not before then.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete without prejudice against re-creation if he wins in the general election. Presently, there doesn't appear to be enough reliably sourced significant coverage about the subject, outside of routine campaign coverage, to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Sal2100 (talk) 20:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.