Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datafari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:12, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Datafari

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N: Non-notable software suite. Despite the claim of an award, the notability of Datafari is not borne out in the sources. 63 ghits is not a good sign for an open-source software project. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 23:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 23:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 23:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as News found a few links but nothing explicitly better convincing for notability. SwisterTwister talk 08:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just for information, I put last sunday a comment on the Datafari talk page. In substance, I was arguing that through several different search engines, I was finding relevant results: media coverage, bug reports, CVE notification, official documentation, attendance to conferences/workshop, forum and group discussion. On gnews, I indeed find few resources in French. Eirmag (talk) 21:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Note to closing admin: Eirmag (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was able to find a few pages mentioning the project, largely in French, but upon closer inspection they're either passing mentions or press releases. I fail to see how this is notable enough for inclusion. Elaenia (talk) 01:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.