Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Cervero Otero

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 08:15, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Cervero Otero

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Still fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL JMHamo (talk) 02:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 02:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Meets WP:GNG with a couple of good articles referenced on the Spanish version of this article [1] and [2]. Nfitz (talk) 04:09, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Currently he's the third goalscorer in Real Oviedo's history supassing Carlos and Enrique Galán [3] Sergio M. Alonso (talk) 07:52, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per Nfitz and Sergio M. Alonso. Diego Cervero Otero is notable due to significant coverage in the media per WP:GNG. IJA (talk) 14:19, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? What significant coverage are you referring to? JMHamo (talk) 19:37, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The 2 links I referenced. Neither of which are routine. A quick google search finds an incredible amount of coverage - mostly routine, but not all [4] Nfitz (talk) 02:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - he has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage (the links above are routine sports journalism), meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:48, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neither are routine. They are feature articles about the player. Nfitz (talk) 02:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. I do not consider the coverage, which basically amounts to 'lower league player scores lots of goals!!!', to be significant enough for GNG to be met. Giant Snowman 20:51, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what either article is. They are feature articles about the player. Nfitz (talk) 02:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - the two links provided by Nfitz are reasonably lengthy articles specifically about the player, but that is basically all I can find about him that is not related to routine match reporting / fansites / blogs / official club sites. Really not sure that is sufficient to pass GNG, but could be swayed if more articles of similar length and depth could be found. Fenix down (talk) 11:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep per Nfitz and Sergio M. Alonso.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:00, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per Nfitz and Sergio, despite it doesn't meet the notability criteria. Anyway, this article must be improved. Asturkian (talk) 13:37, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:FOOTY, and I don't think he passes WP:GNG either. I improved the page, but I'm still thinking that it should not stay here. MYS 77 ^✉ 16:58, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.