Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egg Returns Home

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfy. --MelanieN (talk) 19:54, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Egg Returns Home (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. There is no , or not much reliable sources found AdrianGamer (talk) 12:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. I can't find any sources about it. It does seem like it has just come out, so it can easily be recreated if it gains notability. Elgatodegato (talk) 18:34, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete References on the article are 2 Primaries (steam) and one unreliable (Gaming on Linux allows user generated articles). News comes up with 1 unreliable routine article. Newspaper, books, and jstor, are all empty for this. Per WP:DWD I recommend the content list on List of indie game developers on Wikipedia. Bryce Carmony (talk) 20:04, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to my sandbox. Instead of being deleted, please move it to either User:Anarchyte/Egg so that I can continue to work on it. Anarchyte (talk) 00:58, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Userfy per user request. Before taking the page live in the future, I'd make sure the article has significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources (?) (from a video game reliable sources custom Google search). I'd also ping all of us on the talk page first. czar ⨹ 20:27, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.