Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvis Nelson Anes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:30, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elvis Nelson Anes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite technically having 3 appearances, his professional career only lasted 36 mins with Football Database not having any appearances at all for him. This provides a presumption that the footballer will pass WP:GNG but no guarantee, as numerous previous AfDs of a similar nature have established. Google News contains 3 completely trivial mentions and the results of an Indonesian source search yield nothing better. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:40, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 07:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and GS. With these marginal NFOOTY passes, I always try to think if they justify drafting but that needs confidence about the subject's future potential. There is none in this case and the player lacks SIGCOV so the article fails GNG. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per GiantSnowman's consensus. Paul Vaurie (talk) 18:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:GNG. WP:NSPORT, which WP:NFOOTBALL is part of, is pretty clear on that all subjects must meet the general notability guideline, regardless of them passing a SNG. Alvaldi (talk) 12:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete short career insufficient for establishing notability Avilich (talk) 18:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 00:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable per the reasoning of GiantSnowman. --Lockley (talk) 01:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.