Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiinu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:44, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fiinu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Routine coverage, not sufficient to establish notability. Doesn't pass WP:CORP. Uhooep (talk) 08:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination, all the coverage is routine or minor. --AlexandraAVX (talk) 08:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Business, Companies, and United Kingdom. — Karnataka ^talk 08:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Since this article was created in March, a lot seems to have happened which isn't covered in the text: e.g. "Fiinu shares slump following withdrawal of banking licence" (28 April 2023), "Fiinu on the ropes as banking licence withdrawn" (12 July 2023). However, these would fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH, and neither these matters or the earlier licence and AIM listing are sufficient to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 18:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Fails to prove WP:ORG. Kind regards –––ÀvîRâm7^(talk) 04:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. How about the Business Insider article and links in it? [1] Suitskvarts (talk)

• That article is effectively equivalent to the already-referenced FinExtra item, about the mid-2022 licencing and reverse-takeover, before heading into the broader context of other similar firms which were seeking licences at the time. AllyD (talk) 08:41, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.