- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 01:14, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Gabrielle Aplin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Came across this new unreferenced BLP. Tried to look online for sources, but could not find anything that would pass our guidelines, and also nothing at all comes up when searching on Google News. She fails our notability guidelines for music. She might have a claim under point 2, but the itunes chart is not a national chart and she does not appear to have made it onto the main UK chart with her EP (as far as I have searched). She's a great singer so she will doubtlessly be notable enough for inclusion one day, but I feel that now is too soon.
Note that I used to have this girl on facebook about 3(?) years ago, so I may have a possible conflict of interest. Cheers. doomgaze (talk) 17:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No significant coverage that I can find, article seems to be claiming notability through high page counts, which is not a criteria for notability Rehevkor ✉ 17:21, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No signficant coverage in reliable sources. There's this bit but really, she hasn't quite got there yet. -- Whpq (talk) 16:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No significant coverage found to substantiate notability. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 05:48, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. - SudoGhost (talk) 06:56, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.