Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gajendra Junior Basic School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. kelapstick^(bainuu) 13:54, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gajendra Junior Basic School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Non-notable primary school. TheLongTone (talk) 21:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable and looks like an advertisement. Jim Cartar (talk) 10:47, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete lacks independent sources (I have looked). Primary schools are usually considered non-notable, absent particular reasons to the contrary. I can find no such reasons. --Stfg (talk) 11:42, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:ORG. Elementary schools are generally nn and this one appears to be no exception. No reasonable redirect target that I can find. The Whispering Wind (talk) 15:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Redirect to Education in West Bengal would not be especially helpful.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 13:22, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.