Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gateway House: Indian Council on Global Relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nobody seems to want to talk about this, even after two relists, so calling it WP:SOFTDELETE -- RoySmith (talk) 23:42, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gateway House: Indian Council on Global Relations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. could not find any substantial third party coverage. The declared connected editor has just been adding primary sources and the article just seems an advert. LibStar (talk) 10:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I will have a look at this article to see if I can find sources from newspapers. This is a fairly new think tank. As of now, I have removed some parts of the article as it seems to be copy pasted from the website.--DreamLinker (talk) 21:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:01, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I did see a couple of possible third-party sources in the Google hits, not sure if they are enough to establish notability.PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:56, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- "Moving Forward EU-India Relations" - Gateway House is credited as one of the leaders of this study project sponsored by the EU.
- The Remarkable Rise of India's Think Tanks Brief but prominent mentions in an article on Global Government Forum - not sure if they count as a reliable source.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No votes we're casted, please join the discussing to achieve WP:Consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anoptimistix Let's Talk 03:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.