Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Dance Festival

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 00:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Global Dance Festival (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Event's references consist only of links to blog pages. Article lacks any independent sources with editorial oversight, and without them it fails to meet any of Wikipedia's notability guidelines. KDS4444Talk 23:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' without judging notability, thesis basically a promotional notice for the event. DGG ( talk ) 00:51, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Thesis?" I just reworded and pasted like three sentences to start a stub, how is that a promo? Note: I stuck in another reference, with Denver Westword calling it significant in various ways. Earflaps (talk) 02:38, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:36, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.