Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hum Chale Aaye

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 11:27, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hum Chale Aaye (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This tele-film does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines WP:NFILM and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Saqib (talk) 16:07, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict69 16:14, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict69 16:16, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict69 16:16, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this article as it is star studded film and has based on social issue of joint family systems and their problems which is common in Pakistan.Film also had good reception and has million of views on YouTube.Lillyput4455 (talk) 22:14, 2 September 2018 (UTC) Note to closing admin: Lillyput4455 (talkcontribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]
Not a policy based argument to keep the page. --Saqib (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user is sock of Pakistanpedia (talk · contribs)
unproven allegation Atlantic306 (talk) 17:49, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:15, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've reviewed all the sources, and see nothing but name checking, which longstanding practice holds cannot be used to support the notability of the subject. In no source presented can I find the subject discussed with the "significant coverage" WP:GNG requires. --Saqib (talk) 04:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 20:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep as film meet wikipedia guidelines for WP:television and has reliable sources from international newspapers like Nation.Com and The News.Lillyput4455 (talk) 00:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.