- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. A reference is given, encyclopedic notability clearly established, and AfD is not cleanup. Without passing judgement as to motivation, the nominator should read and inwardly digest WP:POINT. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable, no reference given Terveetkadet 21:25, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The pdf that is linked to is sufficient reference for now to keep. Obviously someone needs to work on the article, but its subject is obviously important enough for a wikipedia article. Bucketsofg 21:52, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I will AGF. I dont think there's way too much western documentation on medeival arab scholars anyways.Bakaman Bakatalk 22:34, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep bad faith nomination. [1]. Demiurge 23:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. Notability is not in question, and there is no reason to waste time on this nomination. (There is an article in the Encyclopaedia Britannica on Hunayn bin Ishaq.) Uppland 10:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.