Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Devika

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

J. Devika (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable as per WP:NACADEMIC. The subject is merely a university teacher with some publications. doesn't fulfill the wiki criteria. Also, many of the sources indicated in the article is not independent of the subject Arjunashokj (talk) 11:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Passes WP:Prof#C1 in a low citation field. Some strange behavior by nominator. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Please revert from personal comments and abuses. we can argue logically, i suppose. (Arjunashokj (talk) 11:47, 29 August 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 12:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 12:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 12:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 12:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Enough published reviews, of both her original books and her translations, to pass WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:49, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Repeated deletion attempt amounting to vendetta and vandalism. NPOV to be preserved. ViswaPrabhaവിശ്വപ്രഭ^talk 06:38, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Citations are quite high for the field and she has an h index of 20 https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=8b1xY5oAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra Lainx (talk) 07:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The case for WP:NAUTHOR with multiple reviews of multiple works brings me to a weak keep. While the case for WP:NPROF C1 would not necessarily convince me on its own, it certainly helps support the NAUTHOR case, and me to a solid keep. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 08:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes NPROF and NAUTHOR Furius (talk) 10:45, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep J Devika is a notable writer and academic from Kerala especially feminist point of view. But mainstream lefts will not agree with this. --Vicharam (talk) 11:08, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep there's sustained coverage.Acrols (talk) 08:15, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes WP:NAUTHOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.