Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Sacker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 14:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jade Sacker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable freelance filmmaker who was at the Capitol storming. There is very little coverage even about her even being at the storming, nothing from before. Another example of WP:BLP1E. JayJay^{What did I do?} 07:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. JayJay^{What did I do?} 07:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:ONEEVENT, WP:BLPCRIME and WP:TENYEARTEST. This person is not notable. If there is any need to include any information about her, it can be done in either the main article or the aftermath one.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 07:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:TOOSOON Maybe one day Jade will produce enough footage to establish herself as a notable photo-journalist. Here WP:BIO1E applies. "In considering whether to create separate articles, the degree of significance of the event itself and of the individual's role within it should both be considered." Her role in the 6th was not significant, one of thousands to enter and film in the capitol, one of many who gave interviews after the event. Some far-right coverage trying to link her presence to CNN involvement is perhaps the most notable aspect, but this would not pass the level for WP:FRINGE. --Salix alba (talk): 17:11, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable, filmed an otherwise notable event, basically just doing her job. Oaktree b (talk) 20:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 01:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:BLP1E. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 13:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete just because you captured a notable event on film does not make you notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not pass GNG and filming an event does not make one notable. Hundreds of people filmed the attempted coup d'etat. cookie monster (2020) 755 06:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete. - This one is a WP:SNOW closure per WP:TOOSOON. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.