Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jalnawalla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested; see WP:SOFTDELETE. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:43, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jalnawalla

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another vanity page about a family created by a single purpose account. No references have been provided and searching also does not provide any relevant hits. Even if all the puffery indicated is true, it probably still would not meet WP:GNG - as establishing the first Fire Temple and Cotton Factory in a district would probably not be enough to indicate the family is notable enough to merit a Wiki article. Jupitus Smart 05:47, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:24, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 15:30, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Probably WP:VANITY, no evidence of notability under WP:GNG or any applicable SNG in searches. Search results turn up one or two possibly-notable individuals and ancestry.com and mirrors, no WP:RS Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.