- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Jinny Jacinto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Actor whose only properly sourced indication of notability is having been in one television commercial; all other sources are WP:PRIMARY and/or YouTubey. I'd normally be inclined to speedy this, but there's a declined prod lurking in its edit history — that said, however, I still don't see how it's anything but a delete in the absence of major sourcing improvements. Bearcat (talk) 23:32, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This source with in-depth coverage certainly isn't WP:PRIMARY and/or YouTubey, and dates from a long time before the television commercial. When I contested WP:PROD deletion I pointed out that there was plenty of coverage found by a Google News archive search that was unrelated to Marriott, so I would have hoped that any AfD nominator would address that coverage in the nomination. Phil Bridger (talk) 00:07, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It ain't good enough to say that there are sources out there, if those sources aren't in the article by the time of close. Bearcat (talk) 03:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Why all this hairsplitting and fussing about one source not mentioned? One newspaper profile doesn't give notability. EEng (talk) 00:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)Keep after improvements. EEng (talk) 06:24, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Weak Delete - Aside from the one article mentioned above, there are other items behind pay walls. However, they do not appear to have Jacinto as the primary subject. This one is probably the strongest looking of the lot. The Google News snippet for this item states "The gold was won by four preteen contortionists Jinny Jacinto Isabelle Chasse Nadine LouisBinette and Laurence Racine Choiniere The silver went to flying ..." which indicates that she has won some sort of award which might contribute towards establishing notability. -- Whpq (talk) 13:59, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
CommentI don't suppose an article in New York Magazine helps at all? I'm going to keep looking on this one - ManicSpider (talk) 01:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Keep As per added sources. I haven't added in the French (?) source above because it goes far beyond my basic comprehension of the language. Having a look at her resume, there should be plenty more places to source her from - she's won about 10 awards for her contortion work for one thing. - ManicSpider (talk) 05:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:15, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Per considerable sourcing improvements, I'm willing to withdraw my nomination. Nice work, guys. Bearcat (talk) 05:20, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.