- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- John Anderson-Thomson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:N, only 2 marginal references that don't prove any notability but may merely show that he existed (assuming good faith because references are either off-line or dead). Moreover, article tone and photos seem more like memorial, WP:NOTMEMORIAL. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Legacypac (talk) 18:17, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as non-notable and not verified. This does indeed have the flavor of an obit or memorial. Unfortunately this isn't the place. --Lockley (talk) 05:49, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete A very interesting gentleman. However, he does not meet WP:BIO. Rogermx (talk) 20:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.